Forsyth

Forsyth v. HP Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20205:16-cv-04775California2,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DONNA J. FORSYTH, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-04775-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DANIEL Vv. COCHRAN’S MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A PLAINTIFF HP INC., et al., 1] Re: Dkt. No. 384 Defendants.

On August 18, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a putative class action alleging that Defendants

|| violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), California Fair Employment and © || Housing Act (“FEHA”), and other California laws. Complaint § 4, Dkt. 1. Daniel Cochran Q 16 || (“Cochran”) seeks to intervene in this action. Notice and Motion for Intervention as Plaintiff and

|| Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (“Mot.”), Dkt. 384. Both Plaintiffs

and Defendants oppose Cochran’s motion to intervene. Having considered the Parties’ papers,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.