Neodron Ltd. v. Lenovo Group Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20203:19-cv-05644California1,737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NEODRON, LTD., Case No. 19-cv-05644-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v.

MOTION TO STAY

LENOVO GROUP, LTD., et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 92 & 104

13 Before the Court is a motion to stay this action pending inter partes review brought by defendants Lenovo Group, Ltd., Lenovo, Inc., and Motorola Mobility, LLC, (collectively “defendants”). Dkt. No. 92 (Mot. to Stay). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the September 4, 2020, hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED. 19 BACKGROUND Plaintiff Neodron, Ltd., (“Neodron”) alleges defendants infringe seven patents: United States Patent Nos. 8,102,286 (“the ’286 patent”); 8,451,237 (“the ’237 patent”); 8,502,547 (“the ’547 patent”); 8,946,574 (“the ’574 patent”); 9,086,770 (“the ’770 patent”); 10,088,960 (“the ’960 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.