Griego

Griego v. The Tehama Law Group, P.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20205:20-cv-02441California4,388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARIA CONSUELO GRIEGO, Case No. 20-CV-02441-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND AND

v.

DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO DISMISS AS MOOT

THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 14, 18 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Maria Consuelo Griego (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant putative class action lawsuit against The Tehama Law Group, P.C., Kes Narbutas, Patelco Credit Union, Eric Wilson, and Matthew Wright (collectively, “Defendants”) for violation of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“RFDCPA”) and violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (“the UCL”). Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 14, and Plaintiff’s motion to remand, ECF No. 18. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant 24 25 1 Plaintiff’s motion to remand contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.