Che

Che v. GFROERER, A California limited partnership

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20205:19-cv-06891California239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NGOC LAM CHE, Case No. 19-cv-06891-VKD Plaintiff,

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

GFROERER, Defendant.

v Plaintiff Ngoc Lam Che filed the present action on October 23, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. O ||} Pursuant to General Order 56 and the Court’s April 13, 2020 order, the parties’ last day to conduct Q 16 || joint site inspection was July 5, 2020 and plaintiff's last day to file a notice of need for

|| mediation was August 17, 2020. Dkt. No. 18. Plaintiff did not file a notice of need for mediation,

18 || nordid plaintiff seek relief from the August 17 deadline. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962). Plaintiff is directed to file a written response to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.