Fu

Smith v. Fu

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20205:19-cv-02119-BLFCalifornia5,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON SMITH,

Case No. 19-02119 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. KOWALL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

DR. LAW FU, et al., AS MOOT Defendants. (Docket Nos. 27, 39)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical staff at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”). Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the complaint stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs and ordered Defendants Dr. Law Fu, Dr. Rachel Ross, Dr. Mark Kowall, M. Votaw, and S. Posson to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 4.1 Defendant Dr. Kowall filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the 25 26 1 In the same order, the Court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.