Hill

Hill v. Clinton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20204:20-cv-04660California298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA SPENCER HILL,

Case No. 20-cv-04660-YGR (PR) Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT Vv. PREJUDICE

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Respondent. 8 This suit was reassigned from a magistrate judge to the undersigned in light of a recent Ninth Circuit decision.! On July 13, 2020, Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed the present action, which was opened as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On the a same day the action was filed, the Court sent a notification to Petitioner informing him that his

13 || action could not go forward until he paid the filing fee or filed a completed prisoner’s in forma

v || pauperis application. The Clerk of the Court sent Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application © || and told him that he must pay the fee or return the completed application within twenty-eight days Q 16 || orhis action would be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.