Gillespie
Gillespie v. County of Alameda
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMUEL GILLESPIE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-03735-DMR
Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION v. TO DISMISS
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants.
On June 5, 2020, Plaintiffs Samuel Gillespie and Suzanne Gillespie filed this action against Defendants County of Alameda (“County”), Marco Torres, Matthew Yarborough, Leo Basped, E. Berumen, S. Holland, Micah Bennett, and Gregory Ahern, alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and related state laws. [Docket No. 1 (“Compl.”).] Defendants move to dismiss some of the claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). [Docket Nos. 9 (“Mot.”), 14 (“Reply”).] Plaintiffs oppose. [Docket No. 12 (“Opp.”).] This matter is appropriate for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Gillespie is a resident of…