Palagi

Palagi v. Jenkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20204:20-cv-03783California878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TINA M. PALAGI, Case No. 20-cv-03783-DMR (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v.

W. Z. JENKINS, Warden, Respondent.

Petitioner, a federal prisoner incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution - Dublin Satellite Prison Camp, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. 1. Petitioner has also paid the full filing fee. Id. This action has been assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with written consent of all parties, a magistrate judge may conduct all proceedings in a case, including entry of judgment. Appeal will be directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3). On June 19, 2020, Petitioner consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Dkt. 3. It does not appear from the face of the petition that it is without merit. Good cause appearing, the court hereby…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.