Levin Richmond Terminal Corporation v. City of Richmond

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20204:20-cv-01609California10,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 LEVIN RICHMOND TERMINAL CASE NOS. 20-cv-01609-YGR CORPORATION, ET AL., 20-cv-01614-YGR 20-cv-01643-YGR Plaintiffs, 8 vs. ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS;

(2) GRANTING MOTIONS TO INTERVENE Defendants, AND AMICI MOTIONS

WOLVERINE FUELS SALES, LLC, Plaintiff, 13 vs.

CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., Defendants, 16 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, Plaintiff, 18 vs.

CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., Defendants.

22 Plaintiffs Levin Richmond Terminal Corporation, Richmond Pacific Railroad Corporation, 23 and Levin Enterprises, Inc. (collectively, “Levin”); Wolverine Fuels Sales, LLC (“Wolverine”); 24 and Phillips 66 Company (“Phillips 66”) bring these related actions seeking to invalidate and 25 enjoin an ordinance adopted by defendants City of Richmond and City Council of the City of 26 Richmond, entitled “Prohibition on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.