Vu

Vu v. San Francisco Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20204:20-cv-04579California1,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER VU,

Case No. 20-cv-04579-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING OCTOBER 9, 2020

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE CASE MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT, CONFERENCE1 Defendant.

12 Having granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Court is required to review Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine whether any claims are subject to dismissal on the basis that they: 1) are frivolous or malicious; (2) fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Marks v. Solcum, 98 F.3d 494, 495 (9th Cir. 1996) . Here, Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he has reported to the San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) that he is the victim of an ongoing hate crime against him by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.