Ferguson

Ferguson v. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20204:19-cv-05262California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ROLLINGTON FERGUSON, CASE NO. 4:19-cv-05262-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) DENYING WITHOUT

vs. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) RESETTING

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: MOTION TO

SERVICES, DISMISS; AND (3) VACATING SEPTEMBER 8,

2020 MOTION HEARING Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 36,

12 The Court has received pro se plaintiff Rollington Ferguson’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 39), and Ferguson’s opposition to defendant Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (“CMMC”) motion to dismiss. (See Dkt. Nos. 36 (motion), 37 (opposition).) First, the Court is in the process of addressing CMMC’s motion to dismiss, which is set for a motion hearing date on September 8, 2020. At this stage – where CMMC has not yet answered Ferguson’s complaint and the Court is considering CMMC’s motion to dismiss – Ferguson’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.