Bennett

Bennett v. Prop. 47 Public Defenders Deaprtment

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20205:19-cv-08166California2,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID BENNETT,

Case No. 19-08166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION; REOPENING ACTION; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

PROP. 47 PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., REVOKING E-FILE STATUS;

DENYING MOTION FOR

Defendants. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

(Docket No. 11)

17 Plaintiff, a state parolee at the time he filed this action, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Public Defenders Lara Wallem and Maried O’Keefe of the “Public Defenders for Prop 47 Department,” and the Sixth District Appellate Program (“SDAP”). Dkt No. 1 at 1. On June 10, 2020, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 7. In the same order, Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and permission for electronic filing. Id. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.