Edwards

Edwards v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:20-cv-05276California1,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERESA EDWARDS, Case No. 20-cv-05276-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS; DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND; VACATING HEARING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant United States of America's ("United States") Motion to Dismiss, filed August 7, 2020. Plaintiff Teresa Edwards ("Edwards") has not filed opposition. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision thereon, VACATES the hearing scheduled for October 2, 2020, and hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND On June 26, 2020, Edwards initiated the above-titled action by filing pro se in state court a "Request for Civil Harassment Restraining Order[ ]," pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 (see Compl. (Doc. 1-1 at 14-19)),2 naming as the defendant Sunil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.