Cortez

Cortez v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20203:19-cv-03446-LBCalifornia9,455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division 11 O.C., Case No. 19-cv-03446-LB 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW M. SAUL, JUDGMENT AND DENYING

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 Re: ECF Nos. 17, 20 17 INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff, O.C., seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social 20 Security Administration denying her claim for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“SSA”).1 The plaintiff moved for summary judgment.2 The Commissioner opposed the motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.3 Under 23 Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is submitted for decision by this court without oral argument. 24 25 1 Mot. – ECF No. 17. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.