Fu

Smith v. Fu

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20205:19-cv-02119-BLFCalifornia7,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON SMITH,

Case No. 19-02119 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DR. LAW FU, et al., Defendants. (Docket No. 29)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical staff at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”). Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the complaint stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment and ordered Defendants Dr. Law Fu, Dr. Rachel Ross,1 Dr. Mark Kowall,2 M. Votaw, and S. Posson to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 4.3 24 1 Defendant Dr. Rachel Ross has not yet been served, and the last request for waiver of 25 summons sent to her at the address provided by Plaintiff has not been returned. Dkt. Nos. 16, 20, 22.

2 Defendant Dr. Mark Kowall separately filed a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.