Thomas

Thomas v. The Regents of the University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:19-cv-06463California292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RENEE THOMAS, Case No. 19-cv-06463-SI Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND;

Vv. AMENDING PRIOR ORDER TO

CLARIFY THAT DISMISSAL OF

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY STATE LAW CLAIMS IS WITHOUT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., PREJUDICE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 53 a

Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment is scheduled for a hearing on September

v 11, 2020. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11(b), the Court determines that the matter is appropriate

|| for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the hearing. Plaintiff requests that the Court reconsider the dismissal of her state law claims with

= || prejudice, and she asks that instead the Court decline supplemental jurisdiction to allow her to pursue those claims in state court. Plaintiff argues, inter alia, that her state law claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.