49Hopkins, LLC v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:19-cv-00811California10,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 49HOPKINS, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-00811-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN AMENDED COMPLAINT FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendants. 12 13 Now before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendants City and County of San Francisco (“the City”), Planning Commission of the City and County of San Francisco (“Planning Commission”), San Francisco Planning Department (“Planning Department”), San Francisco Department of Building Inspection (“DBI”), and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (“BOS”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and General Order No. 72-5, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for September 4, 2020. The Court CONTINUES the case management conference to October 16, 2020, at 3:00 p.m. For the reasons set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.