Greco

Greco v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20204:20-cv-02698California2,568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 LUCIA GRECO, CASE NO. 4:20-cv-02698-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

vs. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendants.

11 Plaintiff Lucia Greco brings this action for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Act against defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Raisier LLC, and Rasier-CA LLC (collectively, “Uber”). (Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 55-76.) Now before the Court is Uber’s motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). (Dkt. No. 14 (“MTC.”).) Having carefully considered the pleadings and the papers and exhibits submitted, the Court DENIES Uber’s motion to compel.1 I. BACKGROUND Ms. Greco is visually impaired and uses a guide dog. (Dkt. No. 30-2 (“Greco Decl.”) ¶ 3.) In 2013, Ms. Greco signed up for Uber—a ride sharing service that allows users to request rides from drivers. (Id. ¶ 7;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.