Nasiri
Nasiri v. T.A.G. Security Protective Services Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ELIAS NASIRI, Case No. 18-cv-01170-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
T.A.G. SECURITY PROTECTIVE
SERVICES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 141 Defendants. 16 Before the Court is defendant Personnel Staffing Group, LLC’s (“PSG”) motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. No. 141. According to PSG, it only provided payroll and workers’ compensation services to co-defendant T.A.G. Security Protective Services, Inc. (“TAG”) and is therefore not liable for TAG’s alleged violations of California and federal labor laws. Nasiri disagrees and argues that there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether PSG was his employer. The Court concludes that PSG was not Nasiri’s employer for purposes of California and federal labor laws. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS PSG’s motion for summary judgment. 25…