Robertson

Robertson v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20205:20-cv-02523California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINALD ROBERTSON,

Case No. 20-02523 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO

FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

v.

1 DOE, et al., Defendants. (Docket Nos. 10, 11)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the Santa Rita Jail (the “Jail”) in Dublin, California, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against personnel at the Jail. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis which will be addressed in a separate order. Plaintiff moves for leave to file an amended complaint, in which he provides names for “Doe” Defendants from the original complaint. Dkt. No. 10; Dkt. No. 11 at 2-11. A plaintiff may amend once as a matter of course under Rule 15(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the amended complaint filed under Docket No. 11 26 27 || supersedes the original complaint and is now the operative complaint in this matter. 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.