Vu

Vu v. San Francisco Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20204:20-cv-04579California1,035 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER VU,

Case No. 20-cv-04579-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING OCTOBER 9, 2020

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

12 Having granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Court is required to review Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine whether any claims are subject to dismissal on the basis that they: 1) are frivolous or malicious; (2) fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Marks v. Solcum, 98 F.3d 494, 495 (9th Cir. 1996) . Here, Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he has reported to the San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) that he is the victim of an ongoing hate crime against him by a neighbor but that SFPD has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.