Tanseer Kazi v. PNC, Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:18-cv-04810California1,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TANSEER KAZI, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04810-JCS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PNC BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 144 Defendant.

This action was originally filed by Plaintiff Tanseer Kazi. In November of 2018, the parties stipulated to Plaintiffs filing an amended complaint naming Linda Scheid as an additional plaintiff. See Order on Stipulation (dkt. 30). Although Plaintiffs originally moved for both Kazi and Scheid to serve as class representatives, Plaintiffs conceded in their reply brief on class certification that only Scheid qualified as a class representative due to Kazi’s bankruptcy, and the Court certified a class represented only by Scheid. See generally Order re Mot. for Class Certification (dkt. 96).1 Plaintiffs now move under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to voluntarily dismiss Kazi as a named plaintiff, without prejudice to Kazi (or his bankruptcy trustee)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.