Weiss
Weiss v. Espresso Roma Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HAZEL WEISS, Case No. 19-cv-00112-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
CIVIL CONTEMPT
v. Re: Dkt. No. 34 ESPRESSO ROMA CORPORATION, Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Hazel Weiss’ (“Plaintiff”) motion for an order to show cause why the Court should not hold Defendant Espresso Roma Corporation (“Defendant”) in civil contempt for failing to comply with the Court’s February 3, 2020 Order enforcing a settlement agreement and its injunctive relief and monetary relief terms. Dkt. No. 34 (“Motion”). Defendant has not responded or objected to the Motion. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed her Complaint on January 9, 2019, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §12182 et seq. and additional state statutes related to alleged discrimination she encountered while visiting a Defendant-owned Subway …