Handy

Handy v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20204:20-cv-00305California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL HANDY,

Case No. 20-cv-00305-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v.

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT;

J. TAYLOR, et al.,

GRANTING IN PART HIS REQUEST FOR Defendants. COPY OF COMPLAINT; DENYING HIS REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS; AND

DENYING HIS REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. 11 § 1983. Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions, including the following: (1) his motion for an 12 extension of time to file his amended complaint; (2) motion for a copy of the complaint; 13 (3) motion for transcripts; and (4) motion for appointment of counsel. See Dkt. 19.

I. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT

15 The Court has dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff has filed a 16…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.