Handy
Handy v. Taylor
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20204:20-cv-00305California596 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL HANDY,
Case No. 20-cv-00305-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v.
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT;
J. TAYLOR, et al.,
GRANTING IN PART HIS REQUEST FOR Defendants. COPY OF COMPLAINT; DENYING HIS REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS; AND
DENYING HIS REQUEST FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. 11 § 1983. Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions, including the following: (1) his motion for an 12 extension of time to file his amended complaint; (2) motion for a copy of the complaint; 13 (3) motion for transcripts; and (4) motion for appointment of counsel. See Dkt. 19.
I. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT
15 The Court has dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff has filed a 16…