Hajro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MIRSAD HAJRO, Case No. 4:19-cv-03406-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE

DISMISSAL DUE TO MISTAKE,

vs. INADVERTENCE, OR EXCUSABLE NEGLECT

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(B)(1)

EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

11 Formerly pro se plaintiff Mirsad Hajro brought this action against his previous employer, defendant East Bay Municipal Utility District (“EBMUD”), for claims based on his wrongful termination. Specifically, Hajro brought the following claims related to his termination: (1) interference of his rights under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”); (2) retaliation; and (3) constructive termination in violation of public policy. Hajro now moves to set aside the previously entered dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) (“Rule 60(b)(1)”) based on mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. (Dkt. No. 18.) EBMUD opposes…