Martinez

Martinez v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20203:19-cv-05498California2,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ANTONIO M. MARTINEZ, Case No. 19-cv-05498-WHO (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING THREE

CLAIMS;

v.

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, SCHEDULE Respondent. Dkt. No.

11 INTRODUCTION Petitioner Antonio Martinez seeks federal habeas relief from his state convictions. Respondent moves to dismiss Martinez’s three claims of prosecutorial misconduct as procedurally defaulted because the state court rejected them as successive. (Dkt. No. 14.) Respondent is correct: the prosecutorial misconduct claims are procedurally defaulted. The state’s successive petition bar is independent and adequate. Martinez has not overcome the bar nor shown that an exception to it applies. Accordingly, respondent’s motion is GRANTED and the prosecutorial misconduct claims are DISMISSED. On or before December 14, 2020, respondent shall file an answer regarding the merits of the remaining claims of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.