Hsu

Hsu v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20203:11-cv-02076-WHACalifornia812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRU K HSU, Plaintiff, No. C 11-02076 WHA

v.

UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ORDER RE MOTION FOR WRIT Defendant.

15 INTRODUCTION This order arises from a putative class action dismissed in August 2011. Pro se plaintiff moves for a writ under the All Writs Act. For the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The background of this case is set forth in prior orders (Dkt. Nos. 35, 69). In short, pro se plaintiff Darru K. “Ken” Hsu entered into a wrap agreement with defendant UBS Financial Services, Inc. for investment and advisory services. In April 2011, Hsu commenced this action under the Investment Advisers Act, alleging that defendant provided services “in its capacity as an investment advisor,” but that a “hedge clause” in his agreement with defendant impermissibly required him to waive certain rights under the Act (see Dkt. No. 17). An August 2011 order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.