Hsu
Hsu v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARRU K HSU, Plaintiff, No. C 11-02076 WHA
v.
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ORDER RE MOTION FOR WRIT Defendant.
15 INTRODUCTION This order arises from a putative class action dismissed in August 2011. Pro se plaintiff moves for a writ under the All Writs Act. For the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The background of this case is set forth in prior orders (Dkt. Nos. 35, 69). In short, pro se plaintiff Darru K. “Ken” Hsu entered into a wrap agreement with defendant UBS Financial Services, Inc. for investment and advisory services. In April 2011, Hsu commenced this action under the Investment Advisers Act, alleging that defendant provided services “in its capacity as an investment advisor,” but that a “hedge clause” in his agreement with defendant impermissibly required him to waive certain rights under the Act (see Dkt. No. 17). An August 2011 order…