Amy
Amy v. Curtis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 AMY et al., Case No. 19-cv-02184-PJH (RMI)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v. Re: Dkt. No. 94 RANDALL STEVEN CURTIS, Defendant.
13 Now pending before the court is the parties’ jointly-filed letter brief (dkt. 94) in which three discovery disputes are presented. The parties dispute whether Defendant is entitled to obtain discovery on the issue of damages; whether Defendant is entitled to obtain discovery regarding monies Plaintiffs have sought and received with respect to similar or substantially similar claims; and, whether Defendant is entitled to depose Plaintiffs, and where appropriate, their guardians in lieu of Plaintiffs. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 94) at 2. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s requests are denied. BACKGROUND Proceeding under pseudonyms, Plaintiffs are a number of children and adults who, at various times in their childhoods, were victims of sexual…