Ellawendy

DISCUSSION

I. Standard of Review

25 Review of the execution of a federal sentence is properly brought as a petition under 26 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See United States v. Giddings, 740 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir. 1984) 27 (presentence time credit claim); Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672, 677 (9th Cir. 1980) (parole decision claim); see also Mills v. Taylor, 967 F.2d 1397, 1400 (9th Cir. 1992) (granting § 2241 petition alleging denial of presentence time credit). Section 2241 is also the proper basis for a habeas petition by a person in state custody who is not held 3 “pursuant to the judgment of a State court,” 28 U.S.C. § 2254, for instance a pretrial 4 detainee, a prisoner awaiting extradition, or a prisoner whose conviction has been reversed 5 on appeal. See Dominguez v. Kernan, 906 F.3d 1127, 1138 (9th Cir. 2018) (pretrial double 6 jeopardy challenge); Hoyle v. Ada County, 501 F.3d 1053, 1058 (9th Cir. 2007) (same); 7 Stow v. Murashige, 389 F.3d 880, 885-88 (9th Cir. 2004) (conviction reversed on appeal); 8 White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1006 (9th Cir. 2004), overruled on other grounds by 9 Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 554 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (listing…