Mai
Johnson v. Mai
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-00827-BLF (VKD) Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
AND COSTS
CHI MATL et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants. qa
On August 20, 2020, the Court granted plaintiff Scott Johnson’s motion to compel
v 14 || discovery responses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) and ordered Mr. Johnson to O || submit an application for attorneys’ fees and costs that “include[s] information sufficient for the © 16 || Court to determine that the fees and costs claimed are reasonable.” Dkt. No. 50 at 2. On
|| September 3, 2020, Mr. Johnson filed a declaration from one of his attorneys stating only that her
billing rate is $350 per hour and seeking fees in the amount of $1,470. Dkt. No. 53. Because this || declaration does not include information sufficient for the Court to determine whether the request 20 ||…