Mai

Johnson v. Mai

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20205:19-cv-00827California271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-00827-BLF (VKD) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND COSTS

CHI MATL et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants. qa

On August 20, 2020, the Court granted plaintiff Scott Johnson’s motion to compel

v 14 || discovery responses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) and ordered Mr. Johnson to O || submit an application for attorneys’ fees and costs that “include[s] information sufficient for the © 16 || Court to determine that the fees and costs claimed are reasonable.” Dkt. No. 50 at 2. On

|| September 3, 2020, Mr. Johnson filed a declaration from one of his attorneys stating only that her

billing rate is $350 per hour and seeking fees in the amount of $1,470. Dkt. No. 53. Because this || declaration does not include information sufficient for the Court to determine whether the request 20 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.