hiQ Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20203:17-cv-03301California8,070 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HIQ LABS, INC., Case No. 17-cv-03301-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Docket No. 137 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc. has filed suit against LinkedIn Corp. seeking declaratory relief as well as injunctive relief and damages. According to hiQ, it has not violated any laws by “scraping” public information about LinkedIn users from LinkedIn’s website. Furthermore, hiQ asserts, LinkedIn has violated various antitrust and fair practices laws by trying to prevent hiQ from accessing the public information on the website. Currently pending before the Court is LinkedIn’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). The motion primarily challenges the antitrust claims asserted for the first time in the FAC. Having considered the parties’ briefs as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.