Hughes

United States v. Hughes

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20203:18-cv-05931California1,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 18-cv-05931-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING SEPTEMBER 4,

v. 2020 FILINGS

TIMBERLY E. HUGHES, Re: Dkt. Nos. 68–74 Defendants.

Defendant Timberly Hughes, pro se, filed a number of documents on September 4, 2020. The Court addresses those filings in turn below.1 I. DOCKET ENTRY 68 Hughes’s first filing, docket entry 68,2 includes a motion to compel discovery beginning at page 12 of the filing, and a motion to strike beginning at page 16 of the filing. Hughes is admonished not to bury motions requiring response by an opponent and resolution by the Court behind pages of other documents (here, multiple deposition notices, which do not in themselves require any action by the Court). Hughes’s motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with the meet-and-confer and joint letter requirements of section E of this Court’s Civil Standing Orders, included for reference as an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.