Ross

National Urban League v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20205:20-cv-05799California8,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

8 NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, et al., Case No. 20-CV-05799-LHK 9 Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO PRODUCE THE

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD v. 11 WILBUR L. ROSS, et al., 12 Defendants.

14 Plaintiffs National Urban League; League of Women Voters; Black Alliance for Just 15 Immigration; Harris County, Texas; King County, Washington; City of Los Angeles, California; 16 City of Salinas, California; City of San Jose, California; Rodney Ellis; Adrian Garcia; National 17 Association for the Advancement of Colored People; City of Chicago, Illinois; County of Los 18 Angeles, California; Navajo Nation; and Gila River Indian Community (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 19 sue Defendants Commerce Secretary Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.; the U.S. Department of Commerce; the 20 Director of the U.S. Census Bureau Steven Dillingham, and the U.S. Census Bureau (“Bureau”) 21 (collectively, “Defendants”) for violations of the Enumeration Clause and Administrative 22 Procedure Act (“APA”). 23 Plaintiffs seek to preliminarily enjoin Defendants from implementing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.