Mendoza

Mendoza v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20203:19-cv-02509California7,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division S.M., Case No. 19-cv-02509-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND DENYING

ANDREW SAUL ACTING COMMISSIONER’S CROSS-MOTION

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SECURITY, Re: ECF Nos. 19 & 22 Defendant.

17 INTRODUCTION The plaintiff S.M. seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her claim for supplemental-security income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“SSA”).1 The plaintiff moved for summary judgment.2 The Commissioner opposed the motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.3 Under Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is submitted for decision by this court without oral argument. 24

1 Compl. – ECF No. 1 at 2; Mot. – ECF No. 19 at 3. Citations refer to material in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.