Hernandez
Hernandez v. Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
LILLIANA HERNANDEZ,
Case No. 20-cv-03633-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE
ARAMARK FOOD AND SUPPORT
SERVICES GROUP, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendant.
13 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike portions of the operative Complaint. The Court finds this motion suitable for decision without oral argument. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ submission, the record in this case, and the applicable law, the Court will GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART the Motion to Strike. I. BACKGROUND On April 1, 2020, Plaintiff Lilliana Hernandez commenced this wage and hour suit in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara. See Dkt. No. 1, Exhibit A (“Compl.”). The Complaint alleges that her…