Hendrix

Hendrix v. Livingston

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20204:20-cv-04365California1,294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TONY HENDRIX, Case No. 20-cv-4365-SVK

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. Re: Dkt. No.

DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, Respondent.

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Petition”). For the reasons stated below, respondent is ordered to show cause why the petition should not be granted. DISCUSSION A. Background The Supreme Court of California for the County of Contra Costa sentenced petitioner to fourteen years imprisonment for violation of California Penal Code §§ 245(d)(1), 417(c), and 12022.53(b). See Pet. at 1-2. Petitioner was in custody at the time the Petition was filed, see id., but was released from custody on June 26, 2020, see Dkt. No. 7. The California Supreme Court denied petitioner’s request for direct review on October 10, 2018. See Pet. at 3 (stating the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.