Summit Estate, Inc. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20204:19-cv-06724California5,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CASE NO. 4:19-cv-06724 YGR SUMMIT ESTATE, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS WITH

v. LEAVE TO AMEND

UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 22 10 Defendant.

Plaintiff Summit Estate, Inc., brings this action against defendant United Healthcare Insurance Company (“United”) for claims arising out of United’s alleged failure to pay for substance-abuse-treatment services at the usual, customary, and reasonable rate (“UCR”). Summit Estate provided these services to patients with health insurance policies administered by United. In the complaint, Summit Estate asserts claims for breach of contract, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, negligent non-disclosure, promissory estoppel, prohibitory injunctive relief, quantum meruit, a claim under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.