Khan

Khan v. Payton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20205:20-cv-03086California1,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN,

Case No. 20-03086 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH v. LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT

TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

M. PAYTON,

Defendant. (Docket Nos. 9, 10)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently housed at the Correctional Training Facility in 18 Soledad, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against 19 Correctional Officer M. Payton for the violation of Plaintiff’s rights while he was at San 20 Quentin State Prison’s Reception Center. Dkt. No. 1. This matter was reassigned to this 21 Court on June 26, 2020, after Plaintiff did not file consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction 22 in the time provided. Dkt. Nos. 4, 7, 8. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s requests for reassignment 23 of the matter back to a magistrate judge are DENIED. Dkt. Nos. 9, 10. 24 Plaintiff has filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.