Soo
Soo v. Lorex Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GERALD SOO, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01437-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL
v. ARBITRATION AND MOTION TO
DISMISS
LOREX CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33 and 34 Defendants.
12 Gerald Soo and Matthew Lauinger (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Lorex Corporation (“Lorex”) and Dahua Technology USA Inc. (“Dahua”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of various state common law claims, violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq., New York’s Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), General Business Law § 349, and New York’s false advertising law (“FAL”), General Business Law § 350. Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and stay discovery is now pending before the Court, as well as Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (“FAC”). After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, and having had the…