Marcie Hamilton v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCIE HAMILTON, Case No. 20-cv-03710-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
JUUL LABS, INC., Docket No. 12 Defendant.
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marcie Hamilton filed this lawsuit against her former employer, Defendant Juul Labs, Inc. (“Juul”), seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief related to alleged unlawful policies and various employment agreements. Ms. Hamilton alleges that these policies and agreements violated the California Labor Code. With the exception of her Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) claim, all her causes of action are pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Pending before the Court is Juul’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or, alternatively, to strike certain factual allegations and prayers for relief. Docket No. 12 (“Mot.”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court…