Marcie Hamilton v. JUUL Labs, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20203:20-cv-03710California7,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCIE HAMILTON, Case No. 20-cv-03710-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

JUUL LABS, INC., Docket No. 12 Defendant.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marcie Hamilton filed this lawsuit against her former employer, Defendant Juul Labs, Inc. (“Juul”), seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief related to alleged unlawful policies and various employment agreements. Ms. Hamilton alleges that these policies and agreements violated the California Labor Code. With the exception of her Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) claim, all her causes of action are pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Pending before the Court is Juul’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or, alternatively, to strike certain factual allegations and prayers for relief. Docket No. 12 (“Mot.”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.