Just Goods, Inc. v. Just, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUST GOODS, INC., Case No. 3:18-cv-02198-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ORDER TO
v. SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT AND
SANCTIONS
JUST, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 158 Defendants.
12 Despite mutually agreeing to terms to end this trademark and breach-of-contract case, the struggles continue for plaintiff Just Goods, Inc. (“JGI”) and defendants Eat Just, Inc. (fka Just, Inc., fka Hampton Creek, Inc.) and founder Joshua Tetrick (collectively, “EJ”). Before me is JGI’s motion for an order to show cause why EJ should not be held in contempt or sanctioned given EJ’s failures to comply with my order enforcing the Term Sheet. As explained below, I hold EJ in contempt of that order for multiple violations. I also prescribe corrective actions that EJ must take within 14 days of the date this order issues or face further sanctions. BACKGROUND My March 30, 2020 Order (the “March 30 Order”) sets out the background…