Cooper

Cooper v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20205:20-cv-03253California868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAN COOPER, Case No. 20-03253 BLF (PR) 11 Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

12 v.

14 RON DAVIS, Warden, 15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Dkt. No. 8. For the reasons discussed below, the instant petition will be dismissed. 21 DISCUSSION Petitioner claims he was denied parole based on “fabricated evidence submitted into [his] “C” files.” Dkt. No. 1 at 5. Petitioner states that he is not challenging the outcome of the parole hearing at this time, “but the unfairness practiced by San Quentin Staff who placed this information in the files without advising petitioner in a timely manner, which 27 precluded him from timely challenging such information as one bogus [sic].” Id. at 9. The information was a report that on August 8, 2017, Petitioner’s wife was discovered to be carrying contraband on her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.