Johnson v. Serenity Transportation, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTIS JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 15-cv-02004-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR
DEFENDANTS
SERENITY TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 313 11 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is an unopposed motion for leave to withdraw as counsel. (Dkt. No. 313.) Schauman & Hubins, P.C., Defendants’ counsel of record, contends withdrawal is appropriate because Defendants have not paid Schauman & Hubins for its past legal services in connection with this case, and are therefore in breach of the parties’ contract regarding payment of attorneys’ fees. Schauman & Hubins has given notice to Defendants and all other parties appearing in this action regarding this motion as required by Civil Local Rule 11-5(a). (Dkt. No. 313-1 ¶¶ 9, 12-13.) After careful consideration, the Court concludes that oral argument is not necessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and VACATES the September 24, 2020…