Pomponio

Pomponio v. Public Storage

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20203:19-cv-00595California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MERYL POMPONIO, Case No. 19-cv-00595-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

PUBLIC STORAGE, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 28.) On February 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), California Civil Code section 51 and California Civil Code section 54. (Dkt. No. 1.) On August 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 28.) Defendant has not filed an opposition to the motion and the time for an opposition has passed. After reviewing the motion, the Court concludes that oral argument is not necessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS the motion. In her motion for leave to amend, Plaintiff “seek[s] to add barriers to access that existed at the time the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.