Tabor

Tabor v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20205:19-cv-01291California4,454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 LORI TABOR, Case No. 19-cv-01291-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 27 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Lori Tabor appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381, et seq. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 25, 27. The matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers and the relevant evidence of record, for the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Ms. Tabor’s motion for summary judgment and denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment.1 I. BACKGROUND Ms. Tabor seeks disability benefits beginning September 17, 2013. AR 16. She applied …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.