Du

California Beach Co., LLC. v. Du

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20204:19-cv-08426California1,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division Case No. 4:19-cv-08426-YGR (LB)

THE CALIFORNIA BEACH CO., LLC.,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING SEALING 13 v. Re: ECF No. 45

HAN XIAN DU Defendant.

17 On September 3, 2020, the plaintiff filed an administrative motion to seal the entire Supplemental Fourth Declaration of Austin Wright.1 Generally, the declaration has sealable information, but sealing the entire declaration does not comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. The court thus denies the motion to seal without prejudice to the plaintiff’s submitting a more narrowly tailored redaction. Sealing is governed by Civil Local Rule 79-5. Among other requirements, a party must submit “[a] declaration establishing that the document sought to be filed under seal, or portions thereof, are sealable.” N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A), (e)(1). Local Rule 79-5 also provides that

1 Administrative Motion to File Under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.