Hall-Johnson
Hall-Johnson v. Golden Gate Regional Center Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CARNEICE KATHRINE HALL-JOHNSON, CASE NO. 19-cv-04177-YGR
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
vs. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
GOLDEN GATE REGIONAL CENTER INC., ET Re: Dkt. No.
AL.,
10 Defendants. 11 This is the second round of briefing on the complaint filed by pro se plaintiff Carneice 12 Kathrine Hall-Johnson against defendants Golden Gate Regional Center Inc. (“GGRC”) and Tessa 13 Garvey. In its prior order, this Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds that 14 (i) plaintiff’s claims, as alleged, were time-barred and (ii) plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts 15 to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. section 1981. Now before the Court is defendant’s motion to 16 dismiss the second amended complaint (“SAC”). 17 With respect to timing, the Court previously noted that the earliest allegations in the FAC 18 appeared to date back to 2012, meaning the filing of the complaint in 2019 occurred well outside 19 the two- and four-year statutes of limitations applicable to plaintiff’s…