Dekker

Dekker v. Vivint Solar, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20203:19-cv-07918California634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERRIE DEKKER, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 19-07918 WHA

v.

VIVINT SOLAR, INC., et al., ORDER DENYING STAY AND

AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT

Defendants.

SCHEDULING ORDER

12 Defendants move to further delay the portion of this case which has only come back before the undersigned due to defendants’ own delay. The motion to stay is DENIED. A prior order stated the facts herein (Dkt. No. 47). In brief, plaintiffs sued Vivint for unfair business practices relating to Vivint’s installation of solar panel systems on consumers’ homes. A March 24 order granted Vivint’s motion to compel most plaintiffs to arbitrate, denied the motion to compel plaintiff Bautista to arbitrate because the language barrier prevented formation, and denied Vivint’s separate motion to dismiss plaintiff Dekker’s complaint. After the relevant plaintiffs filed arbitration complaints, Vivint failed to timely pay its share of the filing fees. So an August 14 order held Vivint in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.