Dekker
Dekker v. Vivint Solar, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GERRIE DEKKER, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 19-07918 WHA
v.
VIVINT SOLAR, INC., et al., ORDER DENYING STAY AND
AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT
Defendants.
SCHEDULING ORDER
12 Defendants move to further delay the portion of this case which has only come back before the undersigned due to defendants’ own delay. The motion to stay is DENIED. A prior order stated the facts herein (Dkt. No. 47). In brief, plaintiffs sued Vivint for unfair business practices relating to Vivint’s installation of solar panel systems on consumers’ homes. A March 24 order granted Vivint’s motion to compel most plaintiffs to arbitrate, denied the motion to compel plaintiff Bautista to arbitrate because the language barrier prevented formation, and denied Vivint’s separate motion to dismiss plaintiff Dekker’s complaint. After the relevant plaintiffs filed arbitration complaints, Vivint failed to timely pay its share of the filing fees. So an August 14 order held Vivint in…