Miller, Jr. v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20205:19-cv-07382California2,240 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ROBERT A. MILLER, JR., Case No. 19-cv-07382-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., [Re: ECF 25] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is a Motion to Remand by Plaintiff Robert Miller (“Miller”). Mot. to Remand, ECF 25. Miller alleges that Defendant Ford Motor Company’s (“Ford”) Notice of Removal failed to meet the “burden of establishing that the amount in controversy satisfied the jurisdictional threshold of $50,000” under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act or prove fraudulent joinder of co-defendant Gosch Auto Group, Inc. (“Gosch”). Id. at 1. Ford did not file an opposition to Miller’s Motion to Remand. Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), the Court has determined that this motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the October 8, 2020, hearing date is VACATED, and for the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.