McAleenan

Doe 1 v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20205:18-cv-02349California1,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JANE DOE 1, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02349-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

JENNIFER B. HIGGINS, et al., UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO

Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

[Re: ECF 407]

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to file under seal portions of their opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss and associated exhibits. ECF 407. Plaintiffs filed their request because portions of the opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss were designated by Defendants as “Highly Confidential/Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or “Confidential” pursuant to the amended protective order (ECF 256) or which Plaintiffs understand Defendants would wish to keep under seal based on such designations. ECF 407, at 1. Defendants filed declarations in …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.